Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 10:35:26 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Welcome to sailFar! Smiley   Links: sailFar Gallery  , sailFar Home page     -->> sailFar Gallery Sign Up - Click Here & Read Smiley <<--

sailFar.net  |  Cruisin' Threads  |  Routes and Destinations  |  Topic: Heading Out to parts unknown « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Heading Out to parts unknown  (Read 2739 times)
castawaysailor
Sr. Member
****

kARRR-ma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 48



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2006, 09:05:22 PM »

no, I'm not russian, just been there 5 times to do photography
Logged

NorSea 27
s/v Castaway
AdriftAtSea
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +80/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 3091


I'm glad I have a sailboat—Wind is Free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2006, 09:07:02 PM »

da.. Smiley 
Logged

s/v Pretty Gee
Telstar 28 Trimaran
Yet we get to know her, love her and be loved by her.... get to know about My Life With Gee at
http://blog.dankim.com/life-with-gee
The Scoot—click to find out more
Fortis
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +43/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 295


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 31, 2006, 12:26:50 AM »

Mr Drifty and I agree on a great many things, it seems...Nikon cameras are another one. Tried Cannon for a while, kept stealing my then girlfriend's Nikon to actually use....Eventually dumped the cannon and bought a Nikon before she scalped me in my sleep.

We used all kinds of supercheap medium format cameras to tie onto weather balloons with timer shutter releases...ah the joys of art school.

Hassleblads are nowadays over-rated...basically they were amazing COMPARED TO EVERYTHING ELSE OUT THERE ...but then most everything else caught up in terms of quality and precision. I would now say you would be hard pressed to find a quality difference between Olympus and Hassleblad...that is pretty telling.


As a rule for buying cameras...I tend to avoid the ones made by non camera companies...like Sony, Panasonic and such. We all know that EVERY company's cameras are built in the same five factories in china...but the comapnaies that are known for being photgraphic equipment firms actually seem to check and compare quality and useability before putting their brand name on them and rushing them to market.

Alex.
 
Logged

__________________________________
Being Hove to in a long gale is the most boring way of being terrified I know.  --Donald Hamilton
Captain Smollett
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +223/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 3462



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2006, 01:52:39 AM »

As a rule for buying cameras...I tend to avoid the ones made by non camera companies...like Sony, Panasonic and such.

I'll second that and put in a specific anti-plug for HP digital cameras.  I've had two, and they both turned out to be pieces of ka-ka.

The second one is particularly aggravating.  We bought it for my aging mother to use to take pictures of her grandchildren; paid a pretty penny for it and it SEEMED like a decently made camera IN THE STORE.  The thing lasted 7 months, and HP's customer service recommendation was "here, we'll give you a coupon for your next HP purchase, but you'll have to replace that camera as it will cost more to fix it than to replace it."  My reply to that notion was "not thanks, don't need your coupon; I'll never buy HP again."

They make poop.  And for some reason, we the consumers keep buying it.
Logged

S/V Gaelic Sea
Alberg 30
North Carolina

Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.  -Mark Twain
Fortis
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +43/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 295


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2006, 05:17:33 AM »

Honestly the best camera option when buying for the non-tech savvy and such...well...you just hold your nose and buy a Kodak digital. They are point and shoot in the extreme, they hold up pretty well, and they have the hands down easiest download photo proceedure of anything.

Alex
Logged

__________________________________
Being Hove to in a long gale is the most boring way of being terrified I know.  --Donald Hamilton
AdriftAtSea
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +80/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 3091


I'm glad I have a sailboat—Wind is Free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2006, 07:30:03 AM »

Actually, Sony makes a pretty decent digital camera, and the picture quality off of them is excellent.  They're also quite easy to use....I've given three of them to family and friends as gifts.  For the more advanced enthusiast, you're definitely better off going with a DSLR from either Nikon or Canon.   The one real objection I have to the Canon equipment is the durability of their consumer end equipment. 

I've been a photographer for over 20 years, and have used the Canon EOS, Nikon Fx, Leica, Hasselblad, Mamiya, Pentax, Sinar and Horseman equipment. 

The Hasselblad equipment is beautiful, but way overpriced for what you're getting IMHO. 

The consumer Canon stuff is junk—you can actually flex the camera body enough to see the twist—but their pro stuff is good. 

The Nikon stuff is excellent—for years they were playing catchup to Canon in the high-end digital market, but the D80 and D200 have fixed that for the most part. 

I love the Mamiya medium format gear, but it's way to big and heavy for a boat.  Same with Sinar and Horseman—large format isn't really an option on a boat. Cheesy 

Leica makes beautiful gear, but also overpriced IMHO.  My only Leica is an ancient M3 that I got at a yard sale for $100. Cheesy  Getting lenses for it has been very painful.

One camera I'd love to get my hands on is a Nikonos RS, but they're very expensive and fairly rare at this point. 

Alex-

I don't think she would have scalped you in your sleep...if she scalped you, you could still mooch her Nikon from her... she'd probably cut off your hands or stab you in the heart...depending on how much she liked you....and whether she wanted to keep you around for other things. Wink

I will probably have to downsize my camera collection before I cut the docklines.  They aren't very happy about just sitting in storage, and I have enough that bringing them all on a boat isn't an option.  Sad 
Logged

s/v Pretty Gee
Telstar 28 Trimaran
Yet we get to know her, love her and be loved by her.... get to know about My Life With Gee at
http://blog.dankim.com/life-with-gee
The Scoot—click to find out more
CapnK
Chief Bottle Washer and Ball Thrower
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +194/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 2811


ARRH!!!


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: November 07, 2006, 10:09:34 AM »

thinking of the cost and problems with the canal makes me want to do the horn instead

LOL, castaway. Smiley

Aren't you fast approaching your departure date? Do you have all of your 'ducks in a row'? Are you at all nervous?
Logged

http://sailfar.net
Onboard "Katie Marie", Pearson Ariel #422
AdriftAtSea
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +80/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 3091


I'm glad I have a sailboat—Wind is Free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #27 on: November 07, 2006, 08:28:23 PM »

He's probably busy packing and loading up the boat... Cheesy
Logged

s/v Pretty Gee
Telstar 28 Trimaran
Yet we get to know her, love her and be loved by her.... get to know about My Life With Gee at
http://blog.dankim.com/life-with-gee
The Scoot—click to find out more
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
sailFar.net  |  Cruisin' Threads  |  Routes and Destinations  |  Topic: Heading Out to parts unknown « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!