Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2013, 02:23:44 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Welcome to sailFar! Smiley   Links: sailFar Gallery  , sailFar Home page     -->> sailFar Gallery Sign Up - Click Here & Read Smiley <<--

sailFar.net  |  Cruisin' Threads  |  Gear Here  |  Man O' Facturers :)  |  Topic: Colligo Marine/Dux synthetic rigging « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Colligo Marine/Dux synthetic rigging  (Read 3533 times)
CapnK
Chief Bottle Washer and Ball Thrower
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +204/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 2937


ARRH!!!


View Profile
« on: March 21, 2008, 01:58:36 AM »

Ok folks, give a warm welcome to the brave John Franta, Director, Colligo Marine, LLC. Their website is at http://www.colligomarine.com , and they are based in Mesa, Arizona.

On another board I read the other day, someone made a post about Colligos synthetic line-based standing rigging. I've heard of the stuff before, know that it is all the rage with racers, but have never considered it a cruiser-style alternative. I made a reply in the thread where I expressed concerns about the life cycle of the line, whether or how much it was affected by UV, and was it really a cost-effective alternative to the now "traditional" stainless wire rigging that is so prevalent these days, that sort of thing. John made an excellent reply, and that gave me the idea for this forum, and to invite John, so here we are.

I imagine John has some things he might want to say right off, perhaps respond to my probably-typical concerns above, and to tell us more about his system(s) and why he thinks they are a Good Thing. Smiley
----------------------------------

Q#1 from me:

John, is there a better way to put that, a different or shorter name or acronym you use for "synthetic line standing rigging"? That's a lot to type. Grin
Logged

http://sailfar.net
Onboard "Katie Marie", Pearson Ariel #422
s/v Faith
Chief Bosun
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +218/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4218



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2008, 02:21:03 AM »

Kurt / John,

 
Quote
I expressed concerns about the life cycle of the line, whether or how much it was affected by UV, and was it really a cost-effective alternative to the now "traditional" stainless wire rigging that is so prevalent these days, that sort of thing. John made an excellent reply.....

  I would like to hear the reply.... either posted here or maybve copied from that 'other' forum.

  Faith is looking for new rigging before her next long cruise, would like to hear more... like what kind of numbers a rig for an Ariel would run?
Logged

Satisfaction is wanting what you already have.
AdriftAtSea
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +80/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 3091


I'm glad I have a sailboat—Wind is Free!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2008, 07:47:57 AM »

One question I had was whether his synthetic rigging is compatible with having a headsail roller furling unit installed over it.
Logged

s/v Pretty Gee
Telstar 28 Trimaran
Yet we get to know her, love her and be loved by her.... get to know about My Life With Gee at
http://blog.dankim.com/life-with-gee
The Scoot—click to find out more
CapnK
Chief Bottle Washer and Ball Thrower
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +204/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 2937


ARRH!!!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2008, 08:46:02 AM »

If he doesn't reply soon, I'll shoot him an email to remind him that he has potential customers over here asking questions... Grin
Logged

http://sailfar.net
Onboard "Katie Marie", Pearson Ariel #422
Colligo
Newbie
*

kARRR-ma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2008, 10:42:22 PM »

Hi Guys,  Dynex Dux, UHMWPE line is the first 12 strand line that has stretch characteristics similar to wire rope.  You can find some stretch and creep charts on our website at http://www.colligomarine.com/Dynex%20Dux.htm

If overdesigned slightly for creep (1/4 inch wire to 7mm or even 9mm Dynex Dux) you will have a shroud or stay that is about 1/6 the weight.  Dyneema, the base material of Dynex Dux is widely known as the best synthetic for UV resistance.  It should be good for at least 3-5 years in the sun.  Whats more, when it is time to replace you just buy new line and splice it on.  You do not have to buy the hardware again, so cost over time goes down considerably compared to wire or PBO.  Even better is the fact that you can get Dynex Dux wet, unlike PBO.  Can't imagine having something on the deck of a boat that you cannot get wet!

Check out the cost comps at http://www.colligomarine.com/CSS.ht

We are working with a rigger in Australia (www.strongrope.com) that is using Dynex Dux on traditional cruising monohulls with traditional turnbuckles (about 3 inches travel). 

Chafe resistance of Dux is probably the best of any synthetic also.  We use high quality shears (tin snips)  to cut it and that requires some amount of effort.   You really have to see the stuff to believe how tough it is. 

If you are concerned about jumping into this with a large investment, a low risk way of trying this new technology out are running backstays.

Forestays are still a problem for extrusion roller furlers.  Bearing surfaces just aren't large enough.  Furler manufacturers will probably be correcting this soon but for now you can use softhanks which some manufacturers have for hank on sails only.

Let me know what other questions you might have. 

Best...



       

     
Logged
Rick Westlake
Sr. Member
****

kARRR-ma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2009, 10:16:56 AM »

Actually, how about as a luff for a free-standing staysail?

I've been thinking about getting a staysail/storm-jib made up for my MacGregor 26X - there is a strap-eye between the anchor locker and the forward hatch that is about 2/3 the jib's "J" dimension from the mast.  My first thought was to rig it for a removable baby-stay, and fit it out to take a hank-on staysail - but what about incorporating the stay into the sail's luff itself, and using super-low-stretch line such as Dynex for the luff and the halyard?

We're talking about 80 square feet or less of stays'l here.  I'm already putting some serious reinforcement under the deck there, and replacing the original strap-eye with a Wichard - it's a good place for a jackline should I need one (even if I don't try to use it for a cutter-rigged Mac.)

How is Dynex Dux for taking knots, or setting on a regular horn cleat?  (KISS method of sail-handling)

(John, I hope you're watching this topic ... I'm warned it hasn't been visited for 9 months)

- Rick
Logged
Colligo
Newbie
*

kARRR-ma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2009, 11:05:04 AM »

I get an email whenever someone posts here. 

Many cruisers and some racers are fitting the luff of their staysail with Dynex Dux.  You could use the new 5 mm dux and our small lifeline terminators on each end.  Lash or shackle the tack to the wichard padeye and then lash or shackle the head to the halyard.  The sail is so small no need for hanks, much simpler and lighter, easier to handle.

Since we now have 5 mm Dynex dux it has opened up a new niche for trailerable boats.  Shrouds and stays of Dux are much easier to handle than wire rope, and lighter for more weight sensitive small boats. 

Knots in UHMWPE line reduces the strength up to about 50%.  Dynex Dux is even more sensitive since it is much stiffer.  When we pull test samples that are spliced with a 72 x diameter bury they always break at the bend.  Knots put a much tighter radii, and therefore stress riser, on the line.
Logged
skylark
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +42/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 667



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2011, 06:57:40 AM »

Apparently you can rig your boat using synthetic line called Dynex Dux.  You would have to use traditional rigging methods instead of metal parts.  Does anyone know how to do this?
Logged

Paul
Skylark, Tanzer 28
Southern Lake Michigan
rorik
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +19/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 158


s/v Mathilda Cape Dory 28


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2011, 02:58:08 PM »

Their website has basic instructions. Fisheries Supply in Seattle sells/sold it. I was told by some staff there that it is not a big seller. Spoke to several riggers at the Seattle boat show. None of them thought the stuff was any any good for a cruising boat. Race boat, yes. Dyneema style lines don't stretch, but they do creep. You have to keep on it. And to save a total of 20 or 30 pounds aloft on a small cruiser.... not worth the hassle in my mind.
Logged

It's not the size of the boat, it's how you sail her......
LooseMoose
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +15/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2011, 06:26:49 PM »

My new rig is all Dynex and it makes all kinds of sense and as a bonus it is cheaper if you do it the DIY way. Stretch and creep are not an issue if you get the right diameter Dynex.

I'll be doing a lot blogging in the near future on the rig. In the meantime take a look at another happy camper over at http://www.garyfelton.com/shanti/

Bob

http://boatbits.blogspot.com/
http://fishingundersail.blogspot.com/
http://islandgourmand.blogspot.com/
Logged
CapnK
Chief Bottle Washer and Ball Thrower
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +204/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 2937


ARRH!!!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2011, 03:29:42 PM »

John -

I spent some time revisiting this idea today, and poking around your site/catalog for an idea of what the state of the art was, how or what had changed, with an eye towards re-rigging my boat later this year. A few Q's for you...

1 - Given my Ariels 5120# displacement, and over-sized 3/16" wire (OEM used the same rig as was on the 8300# Triton, for ease I reckon...), and based on what I can divine from the wealth of info on your site, it looks like I should use the 5mm Dux for standing rigging. However, as I tried to 'assemble' an imaginary rig to get an idea of cost, I noticed that the chainplate connector has 4 transverse holes for lashing, but the line terminator sized for 3-6mm only appears to have 2 transverse lashing holes. Am I missing something here...?

2 - Am I guessing right that each shroud/stay would use a line terminator at both the upper and lower ends, the upper end attaching to a tang, the lower via a lashing to the chainplate connector?

3 - What's the latest information you have with regards to the effects of UV over the long term? It's been almost 3 years since this thread was started, so you should have at least that much more of a dataset. Smiley

4 - Regarding "creep" - which I take to mean the gradual stretching/lengthening of the relevant line/wire over time from being constantly taught - is it really that much of an issue, when the lashings are 12+ inches in length? Doesn't that creep get taken up with a simple tightening of the lashing every so often, monthly or so, perhaps based on usage, I'd guess?

5 - Is there a set % or something for approximately how much is the "volume discount" for rigging an entire boat? The Cart on your site put the materials needed for re-rigging my boat with 5mm Dux at a bit over $1200 (going with 7mm would up that about $200 more, I think). The rig is a fairly standard spar of ~27' length, 1 spreader & 2 lower shrouds per side, a single backstay. I guesstimated about 35' of line for each upper (extra length needed for backsplicing), and about that same length to create two lowers, for a total of about 210' of Dux, 8 chainplate attachments, & 16 terminators.

Some of what I've been reading from cruising sailors in 'lead mine' monohulls is encouraging about what they have seen with Dux in "real world" standing rigging applications. Maybe 'wire is dead', after all! Smiley

TIA for your answers.  Cool
« Last Edit: February 13, 2011, 03:34:19 PM by CapnK » Logged

http://sailfar.net
Onboard "Katie Marie", Pearson Ariel #422
CapnK
Chief Bottle Washer and Ball Thrower
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

kARRR-ma: +204/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 2937


ARRH!!!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2011, 09:32:50 PM »

Bump (for Notification purposes)

Smiley

Note: I also merged another topic from the Boat Bit section into this thread, as we do get visited by the manufacturer of the product, a useful source of info. Smiley
« Last Edit: February 17, 2011, 08:59:43 AM by CapnK » Logged

http://sailfar.net
Onboard "Katie Marie", Pearson Ariel #422
nickmerc
Newbie
*

kARRR-ma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2011, 06:02:03 PM »

I know this thread is a bit old, but I too was curious about Colligo's Dynex Dux so I bit the bullet and bought enough material and terminators to do my lifelines.

I am very pleased with the outcome of the project.  I did it early last summer and it appears (no actual breakage testing done) there is no degradation of the material.  Typically with other polymers they start to get brittle and rough after being left exposed to UV long enough.

I found the splicing easy to do once you get the hang of it.  I was able to replace the lifelines in one day.  They look nice, are very easy on the hands, and cost me less than new stainless.

Pending data on the UV resilience I would like to replace my standing rigging (except the forestay with the RF genoa) in the next few years.  I really like the DIY aspect of it.
Logged

--------------------------------------
Nick
1974 Pearson 30 #517
'Blue Bayou'
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
sailFar.net  |  Cruisin' Threads  |  Gear Here  |  Man O' Facturers :)  |  Topic: Colligo Marine/Dux synthetic rigging « previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!